eeTimes
eeTimes
eeTimes eeTimes eeTimes
Forgot password Register
Print - Send - -

Power management

Extreme Design: When radar failure at 12,000 feet is not an option

February 06, 2012 | Ani Dimusheva | 222904063
Extreme Design: When radar failure at 12,000 feet is not an option Ani Dimusheva of Power Standards Lab explains how they overcame a frustrating power problem at a radar site located on Red Table Mountain at an altitude of 12,000 feet in Colorado where radar failures are hard to fix.
Page 1 of 5

(Editor's note: this is the latest in our on-going Extreme Design series, where a single design or test objectivenot low costdominates the engineering challenge. To see all the previous entries in the Extreme Design series, click here.)

High above the Fryingpan Valley in Colorado looms Red Table Mountain, a massive 18-mile long sandstone ridge protruding sharply from the valley below. The mountain top is accessible by a 4-wheel drive vehicle just two months of the year, a bumpy ride up a single lane road so rough it can wear out the wheels of an army jeep in a single trip. The rest of the year, the only way to the top is by helicopter. Here, at the clear altitude of 12,000 feet, FAA maintains a radar site for guiding aircraft over the Continental Divide. It is arguably one of the worst locations for a radar failure to happen, Figure 1.

Figure 1: FAA Radar Station at 12.000 feet,

Red Table Mountain, Colorado.

(To enlarge, click here.)

Most radar sites are operated on commercial power, and are backed up by a generator with a Power Conditioning System (PCS). The PCS supports the Critical Radar Loads during power bumps, power spikes, voltage sags and transitions from commercial to engine-generated power. The static switch and the PCS unit have to make the transition in less than 4 milliseconds to ensure uninterrupted function of the beacon, radio transmitters and other radar equipment.

The PCS at the Red Table Mountain site had a frustrating problem: PCS batteries were supposed to last up to 4 years, but they only lasted a year to year and a half. The frequent replacement of the batteries was costly and time-consuming. The site personnel suspected that the PCS unit was going to batteries frequently, without the engine sensing a power failure. It was not clear why this would be happening, so they requested assistance in identifying the problem.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next page







Please login to post your comment - click here
Related News
MOST POPULAR NEWS
Interview
Technical papers
Poll
Do you find reference designs help speed your design cycle?